Skip to main content

🛡️🪟💻👈🔓⚙️Group - Print Spooler Hardening Exemption

What this group does 🔓​

Being in this group means one thing:

"This device cannot live under the hardened print spooler, and we know exactly why."

The baseline policy ⚙️🪟💻CP - Security - Print Spooler Hardening clamps the spooler shut. No user-mode driver installs. No Point and Print without elevation. No incoming client connections. No legacy RPC channel. Excellent for laptops. Wrong answer for the warehouse PC that shares a Zebra label printer over SMB. 🏭

This group is the carve-out. Membership does two things at once:

  1. Excludes the device from ⚙️🪟💻CP - Security - Print Spooler Hardening
  2. Includes the device in ⚙️🪟💻🔓CP - Security - Print Spooler Hardening - Exemption

Both assignments are mirrored off this single group. Don't manage them separately. One source of truth, two effects. 🪞

Why both? Because the hardening settings tattoo. Exclusion stops further enforcement; the inverse policy is what actually rolls the registry values back. A device that lands in this group needs both effects to actually be un-hardened.

🛠️ Group Configuration​

SettingValue
Group name🛡️🪟💻👈🔓⚙️Group - Print Spooler Hardening Exemption
Group descriptionDevices in this group are excluded from the Print Spooler Hardening baseline and receive the paired rollback policy that resets spooler-related registry values to Windows defaults. Membership requires written justification, typically a device that shares a printer over the network, a dev workstation that tests driver installs, or a host for a LOB application that ships its own non-package-aware printer driver.
Group typeSecurity
Membership typeAssigned (Device Group)

💡 SuperVision Tip​

This group is manually assigned. And it should stay that way. 👈

The membership flow is the only place the exception is defined; the two policies just react to it. In SuperVision, configure both policy assignments off this group so adding or removing a device is a single action with the right effect on both sides.

✍️ Always document why a device is in this group. The next person to look at the warehouse PC at 11pm on a Friday will thank you.

🎯 Purpose​

Used as an exception mechanism for devices like:

  • Shop-floor or warehouse PCs sharing a printer. Usually a Zebra/Brother label printer surfaced over SMB to a handful of stations 🏭
  • Dev / IT workstations actively testing print-driver installs. Repackaging vendor drivers, validating Win32 deployment, debugging driver signing 🧪
  • Hosts for stubborn LOB apps that ship their own non-package-aware driver. Older accounting / POS / ERP tooling that refuses to be Win32-packaged 🧾
  • The one PC connected to an old MFP with vendor drivers that haven't been updated since Windows 7 and need user-mode install paths 🖨️

This group is for devices that need the exception. Not just devices where users want it.

⚠️ Governance matters​

If you add a device to this group:

  • You should know exactly why it needs the spooler un-hardened
  • The customer should approve it in writing (ticket, email, signed quote, your choice)
  • You should document the business justification and the scope ("Zebra label printer share on WAREHOUSE-PC01" not "printing problems")
  • You should review membership at least quarterly

If you can't justify why a device is in this group during an audit... it probably shouldn't be there.

Warning signs that you're doing it wrong:

  • "Karen's laptop because driver installs were annoying" ❌
  • "The whole accounting department because the LOB app vendor said so" ❌
  • "We can never get it to work otherwise" (translation: nobody checked if there's a Win32 package) ❌

Valid reasons:

  • "WAREHOUSE-PC01 shares the Zebra label printer to four pickers" ✅
  • "DEV-IT-03 is the canary for repackaging vendor drivers" ✅
  • "POS-RECEPTION needs the vendor's non-package driver until we migrate off the legacy app in Q3" ✅

🦸‍♂️ The Spider-Man Rule​

Disabling print-spooler hardening on a device gives that device back every attack primitive the baseline closed. Use it like a scalpel, not a sledgehammer. 🔪

If you start adding devices to this group whenever printing is hard, you're not managing exceptions. You're managing a slow leak in your security posture.

🔗 Related Policies​

🕷️ With great exceptions comes great documentation requirements.

Pro tip: If more than a handful of devices per tenant end up in this group, step back and ask: "Is there a Win32 package or universal driver I'm not using?" The answer is almost always yes, and packaging once is cheaper than maintaining a permanent exception. 📦